দাবিত্যাগ: এটি আইনি পরামর্শ নয়। আইন ও মামলা আইন পরিবর্তন হয়। আপনার নির্দিষ্ট পরিস্থিতির জন্য সর্বদা একজন যোগ্য আইনজীবীর সাথে পরামর্শ করুন।

সব মামলা
Sports Law
Court of Appeal
2005

Bradley v Jockey Club

[2005] EWCA Civ 1056

Ratio Decidendi

A sports regulatory body exercising quasi-public disciplinary functions must comply with the rules of natural justice. The relationship is contractual, and the court will imply a term that the body will act fairly.

তথ্য

A licensed jockey was warned off by the Jockey Club following a disciplinary finding. He challenged the decision, arguing procedural unfairness. The Jockey Club argued its relationship with licensees was purely private and not subject to judicial review.

রায়ের সারসংক্ষেপ

The Court of Appeal held that while the Jockey Club was not amenable to judicial review, the contractual relationship with the jockey was subject to implied terms of fairness. The court would intervene to ensure the disciplinary process was conducted fairly.

মূল উদ্ধৃতি

"The relationship between the Jockey Club and its licensees is contractual. But the court will imply into that contract a term that the Club will act fairly in exercising its disciplinary functions."

Richards LJ

পরবর্তী ব্যবহার

Followed

Applied to other sports disciplinary bodies including the Football Association and UK Athletics.

Related Content