দাবিত্যাগ: এটি আইনি পরামর্শ নয়। আইন ও মামলা আইন পরিবর্তন হয়। আপনার নির্দিষ্ট পরিস্থিতির জন্য সর্বদা একজন যোগ্য আইনজীবীর সাথে পরামর্শ করুন।

সব মামলা
Animal Welfare & Agricultural Law
High Court
2009

DPP v Wright

[2009] EWHC 105 (Admin)

Ratio Decidendi

The Hunting Act 2004 does not require proof that the hunt intended to chase the quarry. It is sufficient that hunting took place — the offence focuses on the activity of hunting, not the subjective intention.

তথ্য

Members of a hunt were prosecuted under the Hunting Act 2004. They argued they were 'trail hunting' and did not intend to hunt a live fox.

রায়ের সারসংক্ষেপ

The court held that the Hunting Act creates an objective test: was a wild mammal hunted with dogs? Intention is relevant only to the statutory exemptions.

মূল উদ্ধৃতি

"The question is whether hunting took place, not whether the hunters intended it."

Owen J

পরবর্তী ব্যবহার

Applied

Applied in subsequent Hunting Act prosecutions.