Disclaimer: This is not legal advice. Legislation and case law change. Always consult a qualified solicitor for your specific situation.

All Cases
Tort Law
House of Lords
1997

Hunter v Canary Wharf Ltd

[1997] AC 655

Ratio Decidendi

Only a person with a proprietary interest in land can sue in private nuisance. Interference with television reception by a building is not actionable in nuisance.

Facts

Residents near Canary Wharf Tower complained that the building interfered with their television reception. Some claimants were licensees without proprietary interests.

Judgment Summary

The House of Lords held that only those with proprietary interests could sue in private nuisance — mere occupiers or licensees could not. Furthermore, the erection of a building that blocks TV signals is analogous to blocking a view, which is not actionable.

Key Quotes

"An action in private nuisance will only lie at the suit of a person who has a right to the land affected."

Lord Goff

Subsequent Treatment

Good law

Leading authority on standing in private nuisance and the non-actionability of interference with TV signals.