Disclaimer: This is not legal advice. Legislation and case law change. Always consult a qualified solicitor for your specific situation.

All Cases
Human Rights
House of Lords
2001

R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

[2001] UKHL 26

Ratio Decidendi

Proportionality is a more structured and rigorous test than Wednesbury unreasonableness. Where Convention rights are at stake, the court must conduct a proportionality analysis rather than simply asking whether the decision was irrational.

Facts

A prison policy required prisoners to be absent from their cells during searches, during which legally privileged correspondence could be examined.

Judgment Summary

The House of Lords held the blanket policy was unlawful as a disproportionate interference with the right to legal professional privilege. Lord Steyn explained the difference between Wednesbury and proportionality review.

Key Quotes

"The intensity of review is somewhat greater under the proportionality approach... the proportionality test may go further than the traditional grounds of review."

Lord Steyn

Subsequent Treatment

Good law

Key authority on the distinction between Wednesbury and proportionality review.