Disclaimer: This is not legal advice. Legislation and case law change. Always consult a qualified solicitor for your specific situation.

All Cases
Evidence
House of Lords
1987

R v Andrews

[1987] AC 281

Ratio Decidendi

A statement made by a person so shortly after an event and in circumstances so closely associated with it that the mind was still dominated by the event is admissible as a res gestae statement, provided there was no possibility of concoction or distortion.

Facts

The victim of a stabbing told police officers who arrived at the scene the name of his attacker. He later died.

Judgment Summary

The House of Lords held the statement was admissible as part of the res gestae. Lord Ackner set out the test: the statement must be so closely associated with the event that the possibility of concoction or distortion could be disregarded.

Key Quotes

"The primary question which the judge must ask is: can the possibility of concoction or distortion be disregarded?"

Lord Ackner

Subsequent Treatment

Good law

Leading authority on res gestae, now also relevant to the hearsay exceptions in the Criminal Justice Act 2003.