Ratio Decidendi
Following the abolition of mandatory corroboration warnings by the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, it remains open to a judge to give a warning about the reliability of a witness where appropriate, but such warnings are discretionary, not mandatory.
Facts
Appeals were heard concerning the proper approach to corroboration warnings after the 1994 Act abolished the mandatory requirement.
Judgment Summary
The Court of Appeal held that judges retain discretion to warn about unreliable witnesses but are no longer required to give mandatory corroboration warnings for complainants in sexual offences or accomplice evidence.
Key Quotes
"It is a matter for the judge's discretion what, if any, warning he considers appropriate in respect of such a witness."
— Lord Taylor CJ
Subsequent Treatment
Standard authority on the discretionary corroboration warning post-1994 Act.