Disclaimer: This is not legal advice. Legislation and case law change. Always consult a qualified solicitor for your specific situation.

All Cases
Criminal Law
Court of Appeal
1971

R v Roberts

(1971) 56 Cr App R 95

Ratio Decidendi

Where a victim takes evasive action to escape the defendant's unlawful conduct, the defendant is liable for the resulting injuries provided the victim's reaction was within the range of reasonably foreseeable responses.

Facts

Roberts made unwanted sexual advances to a woman in his car. She jumped from the moving car and was injured.

Judgment Summary

The conviction for ABH was upheld. The victim's act of jumping was a reasonably foreseeable reaction. Only a 'daft' or 'wholly unexpected' response would break the chain of causation.

Key Quotes

"The test is whether the victim's act was the natural result of what the assailant said and did, in the sense that it was something that could reasonably have been foreseen."

Stephenson LJ

Subsequent Treatment

Good law

Key authority on victim response and causation. Applied in R v Williams and Davis [1992].