Disclaimer: This is not legal advice. Legislation and case law change. Always consult a qualified solicitor for your specific situation.

All Cases
Tort Law
House of Lords
1966

Wheat v E Lacon & Co Ltd

[1966] AC 552

Ratio Decidendi

There may be more than one occupier of premises for the purposes of the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957. An occupier is a person who has a sufficient degree of control over the premises to be under a duty of care to visitors.

Facts

Mr Wheat, a paying guest at a public house, fell down an unlit staircase and died. The pub was owned by Lacon (a brewery company) but managed by a couple who lived in the private quarters. The question was whether Lacon was an 'occupier' of the private quarters.

Judgment Summary

The House of Lords held that both the brewery and the managers were occupiers. However, on the facts, neither had breached their duty — the staircase was not inherently dangerous and a third party had removed the light bulb.

Key Quotes

"Wherever a person has a sufficient degree of control over premises that he ought to realise that any failure on his part to use care may result in injury to a person coming lawfully there, then he is an 'occupier'."

Lord Denning

Subsequent Treatment

Good law

Leading authority on the definition of 'occupier' and dual occupation under the 1957 Act.