Ymwadiad: Nid cyngor cyfreithiol yw hwn. Mae deddfwriaeth a chyfraith achosion yn newid. Ymgynghorwch bob amser â chyfreithiwr cymwys ar gyfer eich sefyllfa benodol.

Pob achos
Company Law
Court of Appeal
1933

Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne

[1933] Ch 935

Ratio Decidendi

The corporate veil will be pierced where a company is used as a mere cloak or sham to evade an existing legal obligation such as a restrictive covenant.

Ffeithiau

Mr Horne, a former managing director of Gilford Motor, was bound by a non-solicitation covenant. He formed a company to solicit Gilford's customers, arguing the covenant bound him personally but not the company.

Crynodeb o'r dyfarniad

The Court of Appeal held the company was formed as a device to evade the covenant. The injunction was granted against both Mr Horne and his company.

Dyfyniadau allweddol

"The company was formed as a device, a stratagem, in order to mask the effective carrying on of a business by the defendant."

Lord Hanworth MR

Triniaeth ddilynol

Good law

Classic example of veil-piercing for evasion, approved in Prest v Petrodel.