Ymwadiad: Nid cyngor cyfreithiol yw hwn. Mae deddfwriaeth a chyfraith achosion yn newid. Ymgynghorwch bob amser â chyfreithiwr cymwys ar gyfer eich sefyllfa benodol.

Pob achos
Company Law
Court of Appeal
1933

Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne

[1933] Ch 935

Ratio Decidendi

The corporate veil will be pierced where a company is used as a device or stratagem to evade an existing legal obligation, such as a restrictive covenant.

Ffeithiau

Horne was a former managing director of Gilford Motor, bound by a non-solicitation covenant. He incorporated a company and used it to solicit Gilford's customers, circumventing the covenant.

Crynodeb o'r dyfarniad

The Court of Appeal pierced the corporate veil. The company was formed as a device to mask Horne's activities and evade his contractual obligations. An injunction was granted against both Horne and the company.

Dyfyniadau allweddol

"The company was formed as a device, a stratagem, in order to mask the effective carrying on of a business of Mr E.B. Horne."

Lord Hanworth MR

Triniaeth ddilynol

Good law

Classic example of veil-piercing for evasion. Approved in Prest v Petrodel [2013] as an illustration of the evasion principle.