Ymwadiad: Nid cyngor cyfreithiol yw hwn. Mae deddfwriaeth a chyfraith achosion yn newid. Ymgynghorwch bob amser â chyfreithiwr cymwys ar gyfer eich sefyllfa benodol.

Pob achos
Employment Law
Employment Appeal Tribunal
1983

Iceland Frozen Foods Ltd v Jones

[1983] ICR 17

Ratio Decidendi

The function of the tribunal in unfair dismissal cases is to determine whether the dismissal fell within the range of reasonable responses open to a reasonable employer, not to substitute its own view of the right course to adopt.

Ffeithiau

Mr Jones was dismissed for the unauthorised consumption of food belonging to the company. The industrial tribunal found the dismissal unfair.

Crynodeb o'r dyfarniad

The EAT held the tribunal had erred by substituting its own view. The correct test was whether dismissal fell within the band of reasonable responses that a reasonable employer might adopt.

Dyfyniadau allweddol

"The correct approach is to determine whether the decision to dismiss fell within the band of reasonable responses which a reasonable employer might have adopted."

Browne-Wilkinson J

Triniaeth ddilynol

Good law

The 'range of reasonable responses' test was confirmed by the Court of Appeal in Foley v Post Office [2000].