Ymwadiad: Nid cyngor cyfreithiol yw hwn. Mae deddfwriaeth a chyfraith achosion yn newid. Ymgynghorwch bob amser â chyfreithiwr cymwys ar gyfer eich sefyllfa benodol.

Pob achos
Contract Law
Court of Appeal
1989

Interfoto Picture Library Ltd v Stiletto Visual Programmes Ltd

[1989] QB 433

Ratio Decidendi

If a condition in a contract is particularly onerous or unusual, the party seeking to enforce it must show that it was fairly and reasonably brought to the other party's attention. Failure to give adequate notice means the clause is not incorporated.

Ffeithiau

Interfoto sent transparencies to Stiletto with delivery notes containing a clause imposing a holding fee of £5 per transparency per day for late return (far higher than the industry norm). Stiletto returned them late and was invoiced £3,783.50.

Crynodeb o'r dyfarniad

The Court of Appeal held that the clause was not incorporated. It was extravagant and unreasonable, and insufficient steps had been taken to draw it to the defendant's attention. The claimants were entitled to a reasonable sum on a quantum meruit basis instead.

Dyfyniadau allweddol

"If one condition in a set of printed conditions is particularly onerous or unusual, the party seeking to enforce it must show that that particular condition was fairly brought to the attention of the other party."

Bingham LJ

Triniaeth ddilynol

Good law

Leading authority on the incorporation of onerous terms. Applied in O'Brien v MGN [1995] and numerous subsequent cases.