Ymwadiad: Nid cyngor cyfreithiol yw hwn. Mae deddfwriaeth a chyfraith achosion yn newid. Ymgynghorwch bob amser â chyfreithiwr cymwys ar gyfer eich sefyllfa benodol.

Pob achos
Tort Law
House of Lords
1991

Murphy v Brentwood District Council

[1991] 1 AC 398

Ratio Decidendi

A local authority owes no duty of care in negligence for the cost of repairing a defective building. Defects in the quality of a building constitute pure economic loss, which is generally not recoverable in negligence.

Ffeithiau

Murphy purchased a house built on a concrete raft foundation approved by the local authority. The foundation was inadequate and the house developed cracks. Murphy sold the house at a loss and sued the council for negligence in approving the defective foundations.

Crynodeb o'r dyfarniad

The House of Lords unanimously overruled Anns v Merton and held that the damage was pure economic loss — the house was defective, not dangerous. A local authority owed no duty of care for this type of loss. The cost of repairing a defective building was a matter of contract and warranty, not tort.

Dyfyniadau allweddol

"A defect in a building is a defect in quality. The loss sustained is pure economic loss."

Lord Bridge

Triniaeth ddilynol

Good law

Remains the leading authority on the non-recoverability of pure economic loss for defective premises in tort. Confirmed the retreat from the expansive approach in Anns.