Ymwadiad: Nid cyngor cyfreithiol yw hwn. Mae deddfwriaeth a chyfraith achosion yn newid. Ymgynghorwch bob amser â chyfreithiwr cymwys ar gyfer eich sefyllfa benodol.

Pob achos
Contract Law
House of Lords
1980

Photo Production Ltd v Securicor Transport Ltd

[1980] AC 827

Ratio Decidendi

An exclusion clause can be effective even in cases of fundamental breach, provided it is clear enough to cover the breach in question. The doctrine of fundamental breach as a rule of law was rejected.

Ffeithiau

Securicor provided a night patrol service for Photo Production's factory. One of Securicor's employees deliberately started a fire that destroyed the factory. Securicor relied on an exclusion clause limiting liability.

Crynodeb o'r dyfarniad

The House of Lords held that the exclusion clause was effective. Lord Wilberforce rejected the 'rule of law' approach to fundamental breach, holding that whether an exclusion clause covers a particular breach is a matter of construction of the contract.

Dyfyniadau allweddol

"It is not correct to say that an exclusion clause can never apply to a fundamental breach. The question is always one of construction."

Lord Wilberforce

Triniaeth ddilynol

Followed

Established that exclusion clauses are to be construed according to their terms, not struck down by a rule of law.

Related Content