Ymwadiad: Nid cyngor cyfreithiol yw hwn. Mae deddfwriaeth a chyfraith achosion yn newid. Ymgynghorwch bob amser â chyfreithiwr cymwys ar gyfer eich sefyllfa benodol.

Pob achos
Animal Welfare & Agricultural Law
High Court
2009

DPP v Wright

[2009] EWHC 105 (Admin)

Ratio Decidendi

The Hunting Act 2004 does not require proof that the hunt intended to chase the quarry. It is sufficient that hunting took place — the offence focuses on the activity of hunting, not the subjective intention.

Ffeithiau

Members of a hunt were prosecuted under the Hunting Act 2004. They argued they were 'trail hunting' and did not intend to hunt a live fox.

Crynodeb o'r dyfarniad

The court held that the Hunting Act creates an objective test: was a wild mammal hunted with dogs? Intention is relevant only to the statutory exemptions.

Dyfyniadau allweddol

"The question is whether hunting took place, not whether the hunters intended it."

Owen J

Triniaeth ddilynol

Applied

Applied in subsequent Hunting Act prosecutions.