Ymwadiad: Nid cyngor cyfreithiol yw hwn. Mae deddfwriaeth a chyfraith achosion yn newid. Ymgynghorwch bob amser â chyfreithiwr cymwys ar gyfer eich sefyllfa benodol.

Pob achos
Family Law
Supreme Court
2010

Radmacher v Granatino

[2010] UKSC 42

Ratio Decidendi

A pre-nuptial agreement that is freely entered into by each party with a full appreciation of its implications should be given decisive weight unless in the circumstances prevailing it would not be fair to hold the parties to their agreement.

Ffeithiau

Katrin Radmacher, a German heiress, and Nicolas Granatino signed a pre-nuptial agreement in Germany before their marriage. The agreement provided that neither party would benefit from the other's assets on divorce. After 8 years of marriage and two children, they divorced. Granatino sought a substantial financial award, arguing the pre-nuptial agreement should be disregarded.

Crynodeb o'r dyfarniad

The Supreme Court (by 8–1) held that the pre-nuptial agreement should be given decisive weight. The court departed from the previous position that pre-nuptial agreements were contrary to public policy. While such agreements cannot be binding in the strict contractual sense (because the court always retains a discretion under the MCA 1973), they should be given effect unless it would be unfair to do so.

Dyfyniadau allweddol

"The court should give effect to a nuptial agreement that is freely entered into by each party with a full appreciation of its implications unless in the circumstances prevailing it would not be fair to hold the parties to their agreement."

Lord Phillips PSC

Triniaeth ddilynol

Followed

Pre-nuptial and post-nuptial agreements are now regularly given significant weight in financial remedy proceedings.

Related Content