Ymwadiad: Nid cyngor cyfreithiol yw hwn. Mae deddfwriaeth a chyfraith achosion yn newid. Ymgynghorwch bob amser â chyfreithiwr cymwys ar gyfer eich sefyllfa benodol.

Pob achos
Family Law
House of Lords
2008

Re B (Children)

[2008] UKHL 35

Ratio Decidendi

The standard of proof in care proceedings is the simple balance of probabilities. There is no heightened standard for serious allegations. The inherent probability or improbability of an event is a matter to be taken into account in deciding whether it has been proved, but is not a separate legal test.

Ffeithiau

Local authority care proceedings were brought in respect of children where sexual abuse was alleged. The question arose whether serious allegations required a higher standard of proof.

Crynodeb o'r dyfarniad

The House of Lords held that the standard of proof in care proceedings is the ordinary civil standard — the balance of probabilities — regardless of the seriousness of the allegations. The previous suggestion in Re H that the more serious the allegation, the more cogent the evidence needed (effectively requiring a higher standard) was disapproved.

Dyfyniadau allweddol

"If a legal rule requires a fact to be proved, a judge must decide whether or not it happened. There is no room for a finding that it might have happened."

Baroness Hale

Triniaeth ddilynol

Followed

Consistently applied in all subsequent family proceedings. Resolved the confusion caused by Re H [1996] about the standard of proof for serious allegations.

Related Content