Ymwadiad: Nid cyngor cyfreithiol yw hwn. Mae deddfwriaeth a chyfraith achosion yn newid. Ymgynghorwch bob amser â chyfreithiwr cymwys ar gyfer eich sefyllfa benodol.

Pob achos
Tort Law
House of Lords
1966

Wheat v E Lacon & Co Ltd

[1966] AC 552

Ratio Decidendi

There may be more than one occupier of premises for the purposes of the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957. An occupier is a person who has a sufficient degree of control over the premises to be under a duty of care to visitors.

Ffeithiau

Mr Wheat, a paying guest at a public house, fell down an unlit staircase and died. The pub was owned by Lacon (a brewery company) but managed by a couple who lived in the private quarters. The question was whether Lacon was an 'occupier' of the private quarters.

Crynodeb o'r dyfarniad

The House of Lords held that both the brewery and the managers were occupiers. However, on the facts, neither had breached their duty — the staircase was not inherently dangerous and a third party had removed the light bulb.

Dyfyniadau allweddol

"Wherever a person has a sufficient degree of control over premises that he ought to realise that any failure on his part to use care may result in injury to a person coming lawfully there, then he is an 'occupier'."

Lord Denning

Triniaeth ddilynol

Good law

Leading authority on the definition of 'occupier' and dual occupation under the 1957 Act.