Aviso legal: Esto no constituye asesoramiento jurídico. La legislación y la jurisprudencia cambian. Consulte siempre con un abogado cualificado para su situación específica.

Todos los casos
Cyber & Digital Law
Court of Appeal
2015

Google Inc v Vidal-Hall

[2015] EWCA Civ 311

Ratio Decidendi

Compensation for distress caused by data protection breaches can be claimed without proof of pecuniary loss. The DPA 1998 must be interpreted consistently with the EU Data Protection Directive.

Hechos

Google used tracking cookies to collect browsing data from Safari users without their consent. The claimants sued for misuse of private information and breach of the Data Protection Act 1998.

Resumen de la sentencia

The Court of Appeal held that compensation for distress under s.13 DPA 1998 did not require proof of financial loss. This aligned domestic law with the EU Directive.

Citas clave

"Compensation for distress is not conditional upon proof of pecuniary loss."

Lord Dyson MR

Tratamiento posterior

Applied

Applied in subsequent data protection claims including under UK GDPR.