면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Competition Law
Court of Appeal
2006

Argos Ltd v Office of Fair Trading

[2006] EWCA Civ 1318

판결 이유

Price-fixing through indirect information exchange (hub and spoke) constitutes an anti-competitive agreement under the Competition Act 1998. A retailer who communicates pricing information through a common supplier participates in a concerted practice.

사실관계

Argos and Littlewoods were found to have indirectly exchanged pricing information on toys and games through a common supplier, Hasbro.

판결 요약

The Court of Appeal upheld the Competition Appeal Tribunal's finding of price-fixing. The indirect exchange of future pricing intentions through a common supplier constituted a concerted practice.

주요 인용문

"The communication of future pricing intentions between competitors through a common supplier is capable of constituting a concerted practice."

Arden LJ

후속 처리

Applied

Applied in subsequent hub-and-spoke cartel cases.