판결 이유
A term that does not go to the root of the contract is a warranty. Breach of a warranty entitles the innocent party to damages but not termination.
사실관계
A singer was engaged for a season of concerts, with a requirement to attend six days of rehearsals before the season. He arrived three days late for rehearsals due to illness. The producers terminated his engagement.
판결 요약
The court held that attendance at rehearsals was a subsidiary obligation — a warranty — not a condition going to the root of the contract. The producers were not entitled to terminate for this breach; they could only claim damages.
주요 인용문
"We think the answer to that question depends on whether this engagement to be in London six days before is a condition precedent to the defendant's liability, or only an independent agreement."
— Blackburn J
후속 처리
Paired with Poussard v Spiers as the classic illustration of the condition/warranty distinction.