면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Sports Law
High Court (Chancery Division)
1964

Eastham v Newcastle United FC

[1964] Ch 413

판결 이유

The football retain-and-transfer system constituted an unreasonable restraint of trade. A player could not be indefinitely retained by a club after his contract expired, preventing him from joining another club.

사실관계

George Eastham, a professional footballer, challenged the FA retain-and-transfer system which allowed clubs to retain a player's registration even after his contract expired, effectively preventing him from moving to another club.

판결 요약

Wilberforce J held that the retain system was an unreasonable restraint of trade. While the transfer system served legitimate purposes, the retain element was unjustifiable as it gave clubs indefinite power over players' careers.

주요 인용문

"The retain system is an unreasonable restraint of trade."

Wilberforce J

후속 처리

Applied

Led to reforms of football's transfer system; influenced Bosman ruling.