면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Company Law
Court of Appeal
1933

Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne

[1933] Ch 935

판결 이유

The corporate veil will be pierced where a company is used as a mere cloak or sham to evade an existing legal obligation such as a restrictive covenant.

사실관계

Mr Horne, a former managing director of Gilford Motor, was bound by a non-solicitation covenant. He formed a company to solicit Gilford's customers, arguing the covenant bound him personally but not the company.

판결 요약

The Court of Appeal held the company was formed as a device to evade the covenant. The injunction was granted against both Mr Horne and his company.

주요 인용문

"The company was formed as a device, a stratagem, in order to mask the effective carrying on of a business by the defendant."

Lord Hanworth MR

후속 처리

Good law

Classic example of veil-piercing for evasion, approved in Prest v Petrodel.