면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Social Housing
Supreme Court
2015

Haile v London Borough of Waltham Forest

[2015] UKSC 34

판결 이유

A person who has been provided with accommodation under the homelessness provisions does not cease to be homeless if that accommodation is not suitable or reasonable to continue to occupy.

사실관계

The appellant was provided with temporary accommodation but argued it was unsuitable due to overcrowding and condition. She sought a review of the homelessness decision.

판결 요약

The Supreme Court considered the interrelationship between the duty to accommodate and the suitability of accommodation, holding that the local authority must ensure accommodation is suitable when discharging its homelessness duties.

주요 인용문

"Suitability is a question of fact and degree, having regard to all the circumstances."

Lord Reed

후속 처리

Applied

Applied in subsequent homelessness suitability challenges.