면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Contract Law
Queen's Bench
1853

Hochster v De La Tour

[1853] EWHC QB J72

판결 이유

Where one party to a contract announces before the date of performance that they will not perform their obligations, the other party may treat the contract as breached immediately and sue for damages without waiting for the performance date (anticipatory breach).

사실관계

De La Tour agreed to employ Hochster as a courier for a European tour commencing on 1 June. On 11 May, De La Tour wrote to say he no longer required Hochster's services. Hochster sued for breach of contract on 22 May, before the contract was due to begin.

판결 요약

Lord Campbell CJ held that Hochster was entitled to sue immediately upon the renunciation. It was unnecessary to wait until the date of performance. The party not in default could treat the contract as at an end and seek alternative employment.

주요 인용문

"It seems reasonable to allow an action to be brought before the day of performance, for the party may have already sustained damage."

Lord Campbell CJ

후속 처리

Good law

The foundation of the doctrine of anticipatory breach, consistently applied and developed in subsequent cases.