면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Employment Law
Employment Appeal Tribunal
1983

Iceland Frozen Foods Ltd v Jones

[1983] ICR 17

판결 이유

The function of the tribunal in unfair dismissal cases is to determine whether the dismissal fell within the range of reasonable responses open to a reasonable employer, not to substitute its own view of the right course to adopt.

사실관계

Mr Jones was dismissed for the unauthorised consumption of food belonging to the company. The industrial tribunal found the dismissal unfair.

판결 요약

The EAT held the tribunal had erred by substituting its own view. The correct test was whether dismissal fell within the band of reasonable responses that a reasonable employer might adopt.

주요 인용문

"The correct approach is to determine whether the decision to dismiss fell within the band of reasonable responses which a reasonable employer might have adopted."

Browne-Wilkinson J

후속 처리

Good law

The 'range of reasonable responses' test was confirmed by the Court of Appeal in Foley v Post Office [2000].