면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Water & Sewerage Law
House of Lords
2003

Marcic v Thames Water Utilities Ltd

[2003] UKHL 66

판결 이유

A sewerage undertaker's failure to prevent flooding is not actionable in nuisance or under the HRA where the statutory scheme (Water Industry Act 1991) provides its own enforcement mechanism through Ofwat.

사실관계

Mr Marcic's property was repeatedly flooded by sewage from an overloaded sewer. He sued Thames Water in nuisance and under Article 8 ECHR.

판결 요약

The House of Lords held that the statutory scheme under the Water Industry Act 1991 was the exclusive remedy. Claims in nuisance were precluded by the statutory framework.

주요 인용문

"The existence of the statutory scheme is inconsistent with a duty of care in the common law of nuisance."

Lord Nicholls

후속 처리

Leading Authority

Key authority on the interaction between statutory schemes and common law claims.