면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Immigration & Nationality
Supreme Court
2017

R (Agyarko) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

[2017] UKSC 11

판결 이유

The immigration rules and Article 8 ECHR require a proper assessment of proportionality when considering whether to grant leave to remain on the basis of a private or family life established in the UK.

사실관계

The appellants were overstayers in the UK who had formed relationships with British partners. Their applications for leave to remain were refused. They argued the refusals breached their Article 8 rights.

판결 요약

The Supreme Court held that the Immigration Rules do not provide a complete code for Article 8 cases. Where there are exceptional circumstances, Article 8 may require leave to be granted outside the rules, but precariousness of immigration status is relevant to the proportionality assessment.

주요 인용문

"A person's immigration status is a relevant factor in the proportionality assessment, but it is not determinative."

Lord Reed

후속 처리

Applied

Followed in subsequent Article 8 immigration cases.