면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Prison & Parole
Supreme Court
2014

R (Haney) v Secretary of State for Justice

[2014] UKSC 66

판결 이유

Prisoners serving indeterminate sentences for public protection (IPP) have a right to have access to rehabilitative courses that would enable the Parole Board to assess whether they can safely be released. Systemic failure to provide such courses may violate Article 5 ECHR.

사실관계

IPP prisoners had served their minimum terms but could not demonstrate reduced risk because the courses they needed to complete were unavailable. They challenged the lawfulness of their continued detention.

판결 요약

The Supreme Court held that the failure to provide IPP prisoners with reasonable opportunities to demonstrate reduced risk rendered their continued detention arbitrary and potentially in breach of Article 5(1) ECHR.

주요 인용문

"A real opportunity for rehabilitation must be afforded to the prisoner."

Lord Reed

후속 처리

Applied

Contributed to the eventual abolition of IPP sentences (though existing IPP prisoners remain affected).