면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Human Rights
House of Lords
2001

R (Daly) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

[2001] UKHL 26

판결 이유

Proportionality is a more structured and rigorous test than Wednesbury unreasonableness. Where Convention rights are at stake, the court must conduct a proportionality analysis rather than simply asking whether the decision was irrational.

사실관계

A prison policy required prisoners to be absent from their cells during searches, during which legally privileged correspondence could be examined.

판결 요약

The House of Lords held the blanket policy was unlawful as a disproportionate interference with the right to legal professional privilege. Lord Steyn explained the difference between Wednesbury and proportionality review.

주요 인용문

"The intensity of review is somewhat greater under the proportionality approach... the proportionality test may go further than the traditional grounds of review."

Lord Steyn

후속 처리

Good law

Key authority on the distinction between Wednesbury and proportionality review.