면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Gambling & Betting Law
House of Lords
2005

R v Goldstein; R v Rimmington

[2005] UKHL 63

판결 이유

The common law offence of public nuisance requires that the nuisance materially affects the reasonable comfort and convenience of a class of the public. It is relevant to gambling law where unlicensed gambling activities create public nuisance.

사실관계

Two cases were joined, both involving the scope of the common law offence of public nuisance. The principles apply to unlicensed gambling operations affecting a community.

판결 요약

The House of Lords clarified the elements of public nuisance: it must affect a class of the public, and the defendant's act must cause common injury.

주요 인용문

"An act or omission which materially affects the reasonable comfort and convenience of life of a class of Her Majesty's subjects is a public nuisance."

Lord Bingham

후속 처리

Applied

Applied in regulatory contexts including gambling enforcement.

Related Content

Related Legislation