면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Family Law
Supreme Court
2013

Re B (Children) (Care Order: Proportionality)

[2013] UKSC 33

판결 이유

Adoption without parental consent (a 'non-consensual adoption') requires the court to be satisfied that nothing else will do. It is a last resort and requires a proportionality analysis under Article 8 ECHR.

사실관계

Local authority care proceedings concerning a young child. The judge made a care order with a plan for adoption.

판결 요약

The Supreme Court emphasised that non-consensual adoption is a 'very extreme thing' requiring proper analysis. The court must evaluate all realistic options and be satisfied that adoption is necessary and proportionate.

주요 인용문

"Adoption of a child against his parents' wishes... is a very extreme thing, a last resort... only to be contemplated where nothing else will do."

Lady Hale

후속 처리

Good law

Leading authority on the proportionality requirement for non-consensual adoption.