면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Administrative Law
House of Lords
1964

Ridge v Baldwin

[1964] AC 40

판결 이유

The rules of natural justice (right to a fair hearing) apply to any decision that affects a person's rights, not merely judicial or quasi-judicial decisions. A chief constable dismissed without a hearing was denied natural justice.

사실관계

Ridge, the Chief Constable of Brighton, was acquitted of conspiracy but the trial judge criticised him. The Watch Committee dismissed him without giving him the opportunity to make representations.

판결 요약

The House of Lords held that the dismissal was void. Ridge had a right to be heard before being dismissed. Natural justice was not confined to judicial proceedings but applied to any body exercising a power that affects individual rights.

주요 인용문

"The principles of natural justice apply to every body of persons having authority to adjudicate upon matters involving civil consequences to individuals."

Lord Reid

후속 처리

Good law

Landmark revival of natural justice in administrative law. Extended the application of procedural fairness to administrative decisions.