Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3)
[2009] UKHL 28
판결 이유
In control order (now TPIM) proceedings, the controlled person must be given sufficient information about the allegations against them to enable them to give effective instructions to their special advocate.
사실관계
Control orders were imposed on the basis of closed material. The controlled persons argued they could not effectively challenge the orders without knowing the gist of the case against them.
판결 요약
The House of Lords held, following A v United Kingdom (ECtHR), that the requirements of a fair hearing meant the controlled person must be given sufficient information to enable effective instructions to the special advocate.
주요 인용문
"The controlled person must be given sufficient information about the case against him to enable him to give effective instructions to his special advocate."
— Lord Phillips
후속 처리
Applied in subsequent TPIM and closed material procedure cases.