면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 판례
Food Safety & Standards
House of Lords
1972

Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass

[1972] AC 153

판결 이유

A company can rely on the due diligence defence where the offence was committed by a store manager (another person) and the company had set up a proper system of training and supervision. The manager is not the alter ego of the company.

사실관계

Tesco was prosecuted for misleading pricing after a store displayed goods at the wrong price. The manager had failed to check the shelf displays.

판결 요약

The House of Lords held that the store manager was 'another person' for the purposes of the defence, and Tesco had exercised due diligence through its training and supervision systems.

주요 인용문

"The board of directors can delegate the function of management, and the acts of the store manager are those of 'another person'."

Lord Reid

후속 처리

Applied

Applied in food safety and trading standards due diligence cases.