면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 주제

사법심사

공공기관 결정에 대한 이의제기, 심사 사유, 구제 및 절차 요건.

소개

Judicial review is the mechanism by which the High Court supervises public power. It concerns legality, not merits. Grounds include illegality, irrationality (Wednesbury unreasonableness), and procedural unfairness.

핵심 원칙

1

Three Grounds — Illegality, irrationality, and procedural impropriety (GCHQ [1985]).

2

Proportionality — Applied where fundamental rights are engaged (post-HRA 1998).

3

Standing — The applicant must have 'sufficient interest' (s.31(3) Senior Courts Act 1981).

4

Permission Stage — Claims must be arguable and brought within 3 months.

5

Remedies — Quashing orders, mandatory orders, prohibiting orders, declarations, injunctions.

6

Ouster Clauses — Courts resist attempts to exclude judicial review (Anisminic [1969]).

핵심 법령

Senior Courts Act 1981

1981

Human Rights Act 1998

1998
보기 →

주요 판례

Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister (GCHQ)

[1985] AC 374

판례 읽기 →

Anisminic v FCC

[1969] 2 AC 147

판례 읽기 →

일반적인 시나리오

Council refuses planning permission unreasonably

If irrational or failing to consider material factors, judicial review may succeed. Planning JR must be issued within 6 weeks.

Related Careers