면책조항: 이것은 법률 자문이 아닙니다. 법률과 판례는 변경됩니다. 귀하의 특정 상황에 대해 항상 자격을 갖춘 변호사와 상담하십시오.

모든 주제

미디어법

방송 규제, 표현의 자유, 법정모독 및 보도 제한.

소개

Media law governs the legal framework for broadcasting, publishing, and online content. Ofcom regulates broadcasting under the Communications Act 2003. The law balances freedom of expression (Article 10 ECHR) against competing rights including privacy (Article 8), the administration of justice (contempt of court), and national security. The Online Safety Act 2023 imposes new duties on internet services regarding harmful content.

핵심 원칙

1

Freedom of Expression — Article 10 ECHR (given effect by the HRA 1998) protects the right to freedom of expression, including the freedom to receive and impart information. The right is qualified and can be restricted where necessary and proportionate.

2

Contempt of Court — The Contempt of Court Act 1981 creates strict liability contempt: publications that create a substantial risk of serious prejudice to active court proceedings are punishable.

3

Reporting Restrictions — Various statutory provisions restrict reporting of court proceedings, particularly involving children (Children and Young Persons Act 1933, s.39), sexual offence complainants (Sexual Offences (Amendment) Act 1992), and family proceedings.

4

Privacy — There is no free-standing tort of privacy, but Article 8 ECHR provides protection through the action for misuse of private information (Campbell v MGN [2004]).

5

Ofcom Regulation — Ofcom regulates broadcasting content, ensuring compliance with the Broadcasting Code covering impartiality, accuracy, harm and offence, and the protection of children.

6

Online Safety — The Online Safety Act 2023 imposes duties on providers of internet services to protect users from illegal content and, for services likely to be accessed by children, from content harmful to children.

핵심 법령

Communications Act 2003

2003

Contempt of Court Act 1981

1981

Online Safety Act 2023

2023
보기 →

주요 판례

Campbell v MGN Ltd

[2004] UKHL 22

Reynolds v Times Newspapers

[2001] 2 AC 127

일반적인 시나리오

Newspaper publishes private photos

The subject may bring a claim for misuse of private information (Campbell v MGN). The court balances Article 8 (privacy) against Article 10 (freedom of expression), considering whether the individual had a reasonable expectation of privacy and whether publication was proportionate.

Social media post prejudices a criminal trial

Publishing material that creates a substantial risk of serious prejudice to active criminal proceedings is strict liability contempt under the Contempt of Court Act 1981. This applies to social media posts as much as traditional media.

Related Careers