ਬੇਦਾਅਵਾ: ਇਹ ਕਾਨੂੰਨੀ ਸਲਾਹ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੈ। ਕਾਨੂੰਨ ਅਤੇ ਕੇਸ ਕਾਨੂੰਨ ਬਦਲਦੇ ਰਹਿੰਦੇ ਹਨ। ਹਮੇਸ਼ਾ ਆਪਣੀ ਖਾਸ ਸਥਿਤੀ ਲਈ ਯੋਗ ਵਕੀਲ ਨਾਲ ਸਲਾਹ ਕਰੋ।

ਸਾਰੇ ਕੇਸ
Company Law
Court of Appeal
1933

Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne

[1933] Ch 935

Ratio Decidendi

The corporate veil will be pierced where a company is used as a device or stratagem to evade an existing legal obligation, such as a restrictive covenant.

ਤੱਥ

Horne was a former managing director of Gilford Motor, bound by a non-solicitation covenant. He incorporated a company and used it to solicit Gilford's customers, circumventing the covenant.

ਫੈਸਲੇ ਦਾ ਸਾਰ

The Court of Appeal pierced the corporate veil. The company was formed as a device to mask Horne's activities and evade his contractual obligations. An injunction was granted against both Horne and the company.

ਮੁੱਖ ਹਵਾਲੇ

"The company was formed as a device, a stratagem, in order to mask the effective carrying on of a business of Mr E.B. Horne."

Lord Hanworth MR

ਬਾਅਦ ਦਾ ਇਲਾਜ

Good law

Classic example of veil-piercing for evasion. Approved in Prest v Petrodel [2013] as an illustration of the evasion principle.