ਬੇਦਾਅਵਾ: ਇਹ ਕਾਨੂੰਨੀ ਸਲਾਹ ਨਹੀਂ ਹੈ। ਕਾਨੂੰਨ ਅਤੇ ਕੇਸ ਕਾਨੂੰਨ ਬਦਲਦੇ ਰਹਿੰਦੇ ਹਨ। ਹਮੇਸ਼ਾ ਆਪਣੀ ਖਾਸ ਸਥਿਤੀ ਲਈ ਯੋਗ ਵਕੀਲ ਨਾਲ ਸਲਾਹ ਕਰੋ।

ਸਾਰੇ ਕੇਸ
Contract Law
Court of Chancery
1840

Hyde v Wrench

(1840) 3 Beav 334

Ratio Decidendi

A counter-offer destroys the original offer, which cannot thereafter be accepted. When an offeree responds with a counter-offer rather than an unconditional acceptance, the original offer is terminated and a new offer is made which the original offeror is free to accept or reject.

ਤੱਥ

Wrench offered to sell his farm to Hyde for £1,000. Hyde responded with an offer to purchase at £950. Wrench rejected this counter-offer. Hyde then purported to accept the original offer of £1,000 and sought specific performance of the contract.

ਫੈਸਲੇ ਦਾ ਸਾਰ

Lord Langdale MR held that no contract existed. When Hyde made his counter-offer of £950, he destroyed the original offer of £1,000. That original offer was no longer capable of acceptance. Hyde's subsequent purported acceptance of the £1,000 offer was therefore ineffective, as there was no subsisting offer to accept.

ਮੁੱਖ ਹਵਾਲੇ

"Under the circumstances stated in this bill, I think there exists no valid binding contract between the parties for the purchase of the property."

Lord Langdale MR

ਬਾਅਦ ਦਾ ਇਲਾਜ

Followed

Consistently followed as the leading authority on counter-offers destroying original offers.

Applied

Applied in Stevenson, Jacques & Co v McLean (1880) to distinguish counter-offers from mere requests for information.

Related Content