Zastrzeżenie: To nie jest porada prawna. Ustawodawstwo i orzecznictwo ulegają zmianom. Zawsze skonsultuj się z wykwalifikowanym prawnikiem w swojej konkretnej sytuacji.

Wszystkie sprawy
Coroners & Inquests
House of Lords
2004

R (Middleton) v West Somerset Coroner

[2004] UKHL 10

Ratio Decidendi

Where Article 2 ECHR is engaged (deaths in state custody or involving state responsibility), an inquest must examine not just how (by what means) the deceased died, but in what circumstances, including the broader question of systemic failings.

Fakty

A prisoner committed suicide in prison. The coroner directed the jury that they could only investigate 'how' (by what means) the death occurred, not the broader circumstances.

Podsumowanie orzeczenia

The House of Lords held that in Article 2 cases, 'how' must be interpreted as 'by what means and in what circumstances'. The jury could return a narrative verdict addressing systemic failings.

Kluczowe cytaty

"The word 'how' in section 11(5)(b)(ii) must be interpreted as meaning not simply 'by what means' but 'by what means and in what circumstances'."

Lord Bingham

Późniejsze zastosowanie

Leading Authority

Established the 'Middleton inquest' for Article 2 cases.