Zastrzeżenie: To nie jest porada prawna. Ustawodawstwo i orzecznictwo ulegają zmianom. Zawsze skonsultuj się z wykwalifikowanym prawnikiem w swojej konkretnej sytuacji.

Wszystkie sprawy
Sentencing
Court of Appeal
2001

R v Offen

[2001] 1 WLR 253

Ratio Decidendi

The automatic life sentence provisions under s 2 Crime (Sentences) Act 1997 should be read compatibly with Article 5 ECHR. A life sentence is not required where the offender does not pose a significant risk to the public, even where the statutory criteria are met.

Fakty

Several appeals were heard together concerning the mandatory life sentence for a second serious offence under s 2 of the 1997 Act.

Podsumowanie orzeczenia

Lord Woolf CJ held the provision should be interpreted using s 3 HRA 1998 to require a significant risk assessment. An automatic life sentence was arbitrary and disproportionate where the offender posed no significant risk.

Kluczowe cytaty

"If the offender is a significant risk to the public, a life sentence is justified. If he is not, a life sentence is arbitrary and disproportionate."

Lord Woolf CJ

Późniejsze zastosowanie

Good law

Key example of reading down a statute under s 3 HRA 1998 to achieve Convention compatibility.