Avertisment: Acesta nu este un sfat juridic. Legislația și jurisprudența se schimbă. Consultați întotdeauna un avocat calificat pentru situația dvs. specifică.

Toate cazurile
Sports Law
High Court (Chancery Division)
1964

Eastham v Newcastle United FC

[1964] Ch 413

Ratio Decidendi

The football retain-and-transfer system constituted an unreasonable restraint of trade. A player could not be indefinitely retained by a club after his contract expired, preventing him from joining another club.

Fapte

George Eastham, a professional footballer, challenged the FA retain-and-transfer system which allowed clubs to retain a player's registration even after his contract expired, effectively preventing him from moving to another club.

Rezumatul hotărârii

Wilberforce J held that the retain system was an unreasonable restraint of trade. While the transfer system served legitimate purposes, the retain element was unjustifiable as it gave clubs indefinite power over players' careers.

Citate cheie

"The retain system is an unreasonable restraint of trade."

Wilberforce J

Tratament ulterior

Applied

Led to reforms of football's transfer system; influenced Bosman ruling.