Avertisment: Acesta nu este un sfat juridic. Legislația și jurisprudența se schimbă. Consultați întotdeauna un avocat calificat pentru situația dvs. specifică.

Toate cazurile
Criminal Law
House of Lords
1982

R v Caldwell

[1982] AC 341

Ratio Decidendi

Recklessness for criminal damage included objective situations where the defendant either recognised a risk and unreasonably took it, or failed to give any thought to an obvious risk ('Caldwell recklessness').

Fapte

Caldwell, a former hotel employee, got drunk and set fire to the hotel while guests were sleeping.

Rezumatul hotărârii

Lord Diplock held that recklessness in the Criminal Damage Act 1971 covered both subjective awareness and failure to consider an obvious risk. This objective approach was controversial.

Citate cheie

"A person is reckless if he does an act which creates an obvious risk and when he does the act he either has not given any thought to the possibility of there being any such risk or has recognised that there was some risk involved and has nonetheless gone on to do it."

Lord Diplock

Tratament ulterior

Overruled

Overruled by R v G [2003] which restored the subjective (Cunningham) test for recklessness.