Avertisment: Acesta nu este un sfat juridic. Legislația și jurisprudența se schimbă. Consultați întotdeauna un avocat calificat pentru situația dvs. specifică.

Toate subiectele

Dreptul concurenței

Acorduri anticoncurențiale, abuzul de poziție dominantă, fuziuni și aplicarea CMA.

Introducere

Dreptul concurenței interzice practicile anticoncurențiale și reglementează fuziunile.

Principii fundamentale

1

Chapter I Prohibition — Agreements between undertakings that prevent, restrict, or distort competition are prohibited (Competition Act 1998, s.2). This covers price-fixing, market-sharing, bid-rigging, and output limitation.

2

Chapter II Prohibition — Conduct by an undertaking with a dominant market position that amounts to abuse is prohibited (Competition Act 1998, s.18). Examples include excessive pricing, predatory pricing, refusal to supply, and tying.

3

Merger Control — The CMA has jurisdiction to review mergers where the target has UK turnover of £70m+ or the merged entity supplies/acquires 25%+ of goods/services in the UK.

4

Cartel Offence — Under the Enterprise Act 2002, individuals who participate in cartel arrangements (price-fixing, market-sharing, bid-rigging) can face up to 5 years' imprisonment.

5

Exemptions — Agreements may be exempt if they improve production or distribution, benefit consumers, are indispensable, and do not eliminate competition (parallel to Article 101(3) TFEU).

6

Private Enforcement — Victims of anti-competitive conduct can claim damages through the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) or the courts.

7

Digital Markets — The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 gives the CMA new powers over firms with 'strategic market status' in digital activities.

Statute cheie

Competition Act 1998

1998
Vezi →

Enterprise Act 2002

2002
Vezi →

Cazuri de referință

Argos Ltd v OFT

[2006] EWCA Civ 1318

Sainsbury's v Mastercard

[2020] UKSC 24

Scenarii comune

Competitors agree to fix prices

Price-fixing is a hardcore restriction under Chapter I of the Competition Act 1998. The CMA can impose fines of up to 10% of worldwide turnover. Individuals involved may face the criminal cartel offence under the Enterprise Act 2002.

Dominant company refuses to supply a competitor

Refusal to supply by a dominant undertaking may constitute abuse under Chapter II of the Competition Act 1998 if it eliminates competition in a downstream market. The CMA can impose fines and order the undertaking to supply.

Related Careers