Avertisment: Acesta nu este un sfat juridic. Legislația și jurisprudența se schimbă. Consultați întotdeauna un avocat calificat pentru situația dvs. specifică.

Toate subiectele

Probe și procedură

Reguli privind probele, sarcina probei, procedura civilă și penală.

Introducere

Regulile de probă și procedură guvernează modul în care sunt conduse cazurile în instanțe.

Principii fundamentale

1

Burden of Proof — In civil cases, the claimant bears the burden on the balance of probabilities ('more likely than not'). In criminal cases, the prosecution bears the burden beyond reasonable doubt (Woolmington v DPP [1935]). The evidential burden may shift to the defendant for certain defences.

2

Hearsay Evidence — Out-of-court statements tendered as evidence of their truth are hearsay. In civil proceedings, hearsay is admissible under the Civil Evidence Act 1995 but carries reduced weight. In criminal proceedings, hearsay is generally inadmissible subject to statutory exceptions (Criminal Justice Act 2003, ss.114–136).

3

Character Evidence — In criminal cases, evidence of the defendant's bad character is admissible through 'gateways' under s.101 Criminal Justice Act 2003 (e.g. important explanatory evidence, propensity to commit offences, correcting a false impression). The court must exclude evidence whose prejudicial effect outweighs its probative value.

4

Opinion Evidence — Generally, witnesses may only give evidence of facts, not opinions. Expert witnesses are an exception — they may give opinion evidence within their field of expertise, subject to the requirements of Part 35 CPR (civil) and the Criminal Procedure Rules (criminal). The duty of an expert is to the court, not the party instructing them.

5

Privilege — Legal professional privilege protects confidential communications between lawyer and client for the purpose of giving or receiving legal advice (advice privilege) or in contemplation of litigation (litigation privilege). It is a fundamental right and cannot be overridden by statute unless by express words (R (Prudential) v Special Commissioner [2013]).

6

Civil Procedure (CPR) — The CPR's overriding objective (r.1.1) requires cases to be dealt with justly and at proportionate cost. Key features include: case management by judges, pre-action protocols, disclosure, Part 36 offers to settle, and the three tracks (small claims, fast track, multi-track).

7

Criminal Procedure — Criminal cases begin in the magistrates' court. Summary offences are tried there; indictable-only offences are sent to the Crown Court. Either-way offences may be tried in either court, subject to allocation and the defendant's election for jury trial. Appeals lie to the Crown Court (from magistrates) or Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) from the Crown Court.

8

Court Hierarchy and Precedent — The doctrine of precedent (stare decisis) means lower courts are bound by decisions of higher courts. The Supreme Court is the final court of appeal. It can depart from its own previous decisions under the 1966 Practice Statement. The Court of Appeal is generally bound by its own decisions (Young v Bristol Aeroplane [1944]) subject to limited exceptions.

Statute cheie

Civil Procedure Rules 1998

1998

Criminal Justice Act 2003

2003

Civil Evidence Act 1995

1995

Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984

1984

Criminal Procedure Rules 2020

2020

Cazuri de referință

Woolmington v DPP

[1935] AC 462

Citește cazul →

Young v Bristol Aeroplane Co

[1944] KB 718

R v Turnbull

[1977] QB 224

Folkes v Chadd

(1782) 3 Doug KB 157

R v Horncastle

[2009] UKSC 14

Scenarii comune

Key witness refuses to attend court

In civil cases, a witness summons can be issued under CPR Part 34 compelling attendance. In criminal cases, a witness summons is issued under s.97 Magistrates' Courts Act 1980 or s.2 Criminal Procedure (Attendance of Witnesses) Act 1965. Failure to comply without reasonable excuse is a contempt of court.

Police obtained evidence through an unlawful search

Under s.78 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE), the court has discretion to exclude evidence if its admission would have such an adverse effect on the fairness of proceedings that it ought not to be admitted. Unlike in some jurisdictions, there is no automatic exclusionary rule — illegally obtained evidence is not automatically inadmissible.

Expert witness gives an opinion outside their expertise

Expert evidence must be within the witness's field of expertise and must assist the court. Under CPR Part 35 (civil) and CrimPR Part 19 (criminal), the expert's overriding duty is to the court. Evidence outside the expert's competence may be excluded and could undermine the party's case.

Making a Part 36 offer to settle a civil claim

A Part 36 offer is a formal offer to settle under CPR Part 36. If the offeree rejects it and fails to obtain a better result at trial, adverse costs consequences follow: the offeree typically pays the offeror's costs from the date the offer could have been accepted, plus enhanced interest and an additional amount (up to £75,000).

Related Careers