ข้อจำกัดความรับผิดชอบ: นี่ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำทางกฎหมาย กฎหมายและคดีมีการเปลี่ยนแปลง โปรดปรึกษาทนายความที่มีคุณสมบัติสำหรับสถานการณ์เฉพาะของคุณ

คดีทั้งหมด
Company Law
Court of Appeal
1933

Gilford Motor Co Ltd v Horne

[1933] Ch 935

Ratio Decidendi

The corporate veil will be pierced where a company is used as a device or stratagem to evade an existing legal obligation, such as a restrictive covenant.

ข้อเท็จจริง

Horne was a former managing director of Gilford Motor, bound by a non-solicitation covenant. He incorporated a company and used it to solicit Gilford's customers, circumventing the covenant.

สรุปคำพิพากษา

The Court of Appeal pierced the corporate veil. The company was formed as a device to mask Horne's activities and evade his contractual obligations. An injunction was granted against both Horne and the company.

คำกล่าวสำคัญ

"The company was formed as a device, a stratagem, in order to mask the effective carrying on of a business of Mr E.B. Horne."

Lord Hanworth MR

การอ้างอิงภายหลัง

Good law

Classic example of veil-piercing for evasion. Approved in Prest v Petrodel [2013] as an illustration of the evasion principle.