ข้อจำกัดความรับผิดชอบ: นี่ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำทางกฎหมาย กฎหมายและคดีมีการเปลี่ยนแปลง โปรดปรึกษาทนายความที่มีคุณสมบัติสำหรับสถานการณ์เฉพาะของคุณ

คดีทั้งหมด
Tort Law
House of Lords
1951

Paris v Stepney Borough Council

[1951] AC 367

Ratio Decidendi

When assessing breach of duty, the seriousness of potential harm is a relevant factor. A greater risk of serious injury to a particular claimant may require greater precautions.

ข้อเท็จจริง

Paris, a one-eyed man, was employed by the council as a mechanic. While hammering a bolt, a chip of metal flew into his good eye, blinding him completely. The council did not provide goggles, which was standard practice for two-eyed workers.

สรุปคำพิพากษา

The House of Lords held the council liable. Although it might not have been negligent to fail to provide goggles to a two-eyed worker, the severity of potential harm to a one-eyed worker was much greater (total blindness vs partial impairment), requiring greater precautions.

คำกล่าวสำคัญ

"The gravity of the harm which may be suffered by the workman is a relevant consideration in determining the precautions which the employer is bound to take."

Lord Normand

การอ้างอิงภายหลัง

Good law

Cited as authority on the relevance of the severity of potential injury in breach of duty analysis.