ข้อจำกัดความรับผิดชอบ: นี่ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำทางกฎหมาย กฎหมายและคดีมีการเปลี่ยนแปลง โปรดปรึกษาทนายความที่มีคุณสมบัติสำหรับสถานการณ์เฉพาะของคุณ

คดีทั้งหมด
Counter-Terrorism Law
House of Lords
2009

Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3)

[2009] UKHL 28

Ratio Decidendi

In control order (now TPIM) proceedings, the controlled person must be given sufficient information about the allegations against them to enable them to give effective instructions to their special advocate.

ข้อเท็จจริง

Control orders were imposed on the basis of closed material. The controlled persons argued they could not effectively challenge the orders without knowing the gist of the case against them.

สรุปคำพิพากษา

The House of Lords held, following A v United Kingdom (ECtHR), that the requirements of a fair hearing meant the controlled person must be given sufficient information to enable effective instructions to the special advocate.

คำกล่าวสำคัญ

"The controlled person must be given sufficient information about the case against him to enable him to give effective instructions to his special advocate."

Lord Phillips

การอ้างอิงภายหลัง

Leading Authority

Applied in subsequent TPIM and closed material procedure cases.