ข้อจำกัดความรับผิดชอบ: นี่ไม่ใช่คำแนะนำทางกฎหมาย กฎหมายและคดีมีการเปลี่ยนแปลง โปรดปรึกษาทนายความที่มีคุณสมบัติสำหรับสถานการณ์เฉพาะของคุณ

คดีทั้งหมด
Property Law
Court of Chancery
1848

Tulk v Moxhay

(1848) 2 Ph 774

Ratio Decidendi

A restrictive covenant (negative obligation) attached to land can be enforced against subsequent purchasers who take the land with notice of the covenant, in equity.

ข้อเท็จจริง

Tulk sold a garden in Leicester Square to Elms, who covenanted to maintain it as a garden. The land passed through several hands until it was purchased by Moxhay, who intended to build on it. Moxhay had notice of the covenant.

สรุปคำพิพากษา

Lord Cottenham LC held that equity would enforce the restrictive covenant against Moxhay because he had taken the land with notice of it. It would be inequitable to allow him to disregard the covenant.

คำกล่าวสำคัญ

"If an equity is attached to the property by the owner, no one purchasing with notice of that equity can stand in a different situation from the party from whom he purchased."

Lord Cottenham LC

การอ้างอิงภายหลัง

Good law

Foundation of the law of restrictive covenants in land law. The rules have been developed by subsequent cases and now require registration under the Land Registration Act 2002.