免责声明:本网站不构成法律建议。法律法规和判例法会发生变化。请务必就您的具体情况咨询合格的律师。

所有案例
Sports Law
High Court (Chancery Division)
1964

Eastham v Newcastle United FC

[1964] Ch 413

判决理由

The football retain-and-transfer system constituted an unreasonable restraint of trade. A player could not be indefinitely retained by a club after his contract expired, preventing him from joining another club.

事实

George Eastham, a professional footballer, challenged the FA retain-and-transfer system which allowed clubs to retain a player's registration even after his contract expired, effectively preventing him from moving to another club.

判决摘要

Wilberforce J held that the retain system was an unreasonable restraint of trade. While the transfer system served legitimate purposes, the retain element was unjustifiable as it gave clubs indefinite power over players' careers.

关键引述

"The retain system is an unreasonable restraint of trade."

Wilberforce J

后续处理

Applied

Led to reforms of football's transfer system; influenced Bosman ruling.